Catch Every Technical Error
The 'well, actually' reader, put to work: lists every factual, numerical, technical and terminological slip in the article, then ranks them by whether they change the story or are just pedantry.
What this template answers
Each item below becomes a heading in the AI response.
- Which errors change what the article means, and what is the correct version?
- Which numbers, units, dates or comparisons are wrong or misleading?
- Which technical terms are misused, and what do they actually mean?
- Which points are merely pedantic — technically wrong, but harmless?
- Which claims can't be checked from the text alone, and what would settle them?
- How much should these errors change my trust in the rest of the piece?
Categories
- Critical Thinking & Skepticism
- News & Journalism
Tags
- well actually
- pedant
- fact-check
- corrections
- accuracy
- reddit
Creator
More on SoWhatify